Odious and Peculiar
Philology and esoterica: scribblings, ravings and mutterings.
O&P's Current Pick:
Sunday, December 16, 2007
And on to other things. I've still got a good many books, and one of them that I've been meaning to mention is the Art of Courtly Love, by Andreas Capellanus. It's a tongue in cheek handbook on Love, from getting to keeping to increasing. What struck me reading it was how perfectly applicable to high school romances it all was. Capellanus touches with a needle when he "say[s] and insist[s] that before his eighteenth year a man cannot be a true lover, because up to that age he is overcome with embarrassment over any little thing...." Tarkington's Seventeen might have been written with that maxim in mind.
Capellanus also is the first source I have encounter for the "base" system: the division of the advance of Love's player on the corners of the baseball diamond. He, of course, doesn't mention the game itself, but he does say that "[f]rom ancient times four distinct stages have been established in love: the first consists in the giving of hope, the second in the granting of a kiss, the third in the enjoyment of an embrace, and the fourth culminates in the yielding of the whole person." I was never quite clear what second and third were, but now I have a 12th century authority.
The Art of Courtly Love's worth reading just for the odd power system it espouses, in which the lover must do whatever his beloved--or indeed any woman--commands, and the woman is free to choose whichever lover she finds most admirable; but she must choose. A woman who never chooses a lover is, in one elaborate allegory designed to unlace a pretty bodice, doomed in a strange afterlife to wear fox skins in burning heat while riding in Love's train, then to sit upon thorns and been jounced by men much to her discomfort. Whereas a woman who takes a lover may therefore much improve him, and thereby win great renown. It's a strange book, and even as exaggeration points to a perturbed state of things. I shall close with Love's rules, as won by an unnamed knight (I think Lancelot) from King Arthur's court.
I. Marriage is no real excuse for not loving.
my history teacher mentioned this capellanus as an example to the shift of the topics that the people wrote about at that time. nice to know he's still around, in a way.
An example of the shift away from Roman mores? Or as something shifted away from, after the Middle Ages?
This listing of the Rules of Love, and self-mummified monks in Japan, make my life worth living. Thank you. Your dad put me on to this blog. Phew! Bookmarked.
I am a bit confused by the markers Capellanus lays out. In my experience the kiss comes after, not before, the granting of an embrace.
I don't know if the kiss is what we would consider a kiss, or if it is simply anywhere below the wrist. Tho' I suppose that would depend upon where she held her arms.Post a Comment
Of course, the kiss was not always as romantically charged as we now think it. The early Christians exchanged the kiss of charity, and even Admiral Lord Nelson could say, "Kiss me, Hardy," without launching a thousand slash-fics.
And Capellanus' embrace might be more what we would consider heavy petting.